Which language should philosophers use: technical or common language? In a book as important for intellectual historians as it is for philosophers, Lodi Nauta addresses a vital question which still has resonance today: is the discipline of philosophy assisted or disadvantaged by employing a special vocabulary? By the Middle Ages philosophy had become a highly technical discipline, with its own lexicon and methods. The Renaissance humanist critique of this specialised language has been dismissed as philosophically superficial, but the author demonstrates that it makes a crucial point: it is through the misuse of language that philosophical problems arise. He charts the influence of this critique on early modern philosophers, including Hobbes and Locke, and shows how it led to the downfall of medieval Aristotelianism and the gradual democratization of language and knowledge. His book will be essential reading for anyone interested in the transition from medieval to modern philosophy.
- Provides a clear and comprehensive analysis of a fundamental, yet underexplored feature of the transition from medieval to early-modern thought
- Shows the philosophical significance of the humanist and early-modern critique of language
- Sheds light on current debates about the benefits and drawbacks of technical language in philosophy
Read more
Reviews & endorsements
'Nauta is among the most distinguished historians of philosophy today. His study breaks new ground by concentrating on a vital issue in the early modern rivalry between humanism and scholasticism which still has great resonance in modern academe: the advantages and disadvantages that accrue to philosophy, or any professionalized study, from employing a special technical vocabulary to discuss philosophical problems.' James Hankins, Harvard University
'This book is a great and inspiring tour d'horizon into philosophical reflection on the use of language – and, consequently, on linguistic practice – from the emergence of Renaissance humanism to major thinkers such as Hobbes and Locke. The author invites us into his novel and fascinating story of the genesis of Renaissance and Early Modern (and even contemporary) philosophy.' Jan Papy, Catholic University of Leuven
See more reviews
Customer reviews

Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review

Log in to review

Review was not posted due to profanity
×

, create a review

(If you're not , sign out)

Please enter the right captcha value

Please enter a star rating.

Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

How do you rate this item?

Reviews must contain at least 12 words about the product.

×

Product details
- Date Published: April 2024
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9781108994118
- length: 281 pages
- dimensions: 229 x 152 x 15 mm
- weight: 0.412kg
- availability: Available
Table of Contents
Introduction
1. Early Humanist Critics of Scholastic Language: Francesco Petrarca and Leonardo Bruni
2. From a Linguistic Point of View: Lorenzo Valla's Critique of Aristotelian-Scholastic Philosophy
3. Giovanni Pontano on Language, Meaning, and Grammar
4. Juan Luis Vives on Language, Knowledge, and the Topics
5. Anti-Essentialism and the Rhetoricization of Knowledge: Mario Nizolio's Humanist Attack on Universals
6. Skepticism and the Critique of Language in Francisco Sanches
7. Thomas Hobbes and the Rhetoric of Common Language
8. Between Private Signification and Common Use: Locke on Ideas, Words, and the Social Dimension of Language
Conclusion.
Look Inside
Author
Lodi Nauta, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Lodi Nauta is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Groningen. He is author and editor of several monographs and essay collections, including the award-winning In Defense of Common Sense: Lorenzo Valla's Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosophy (2009), and has written numerous journal articles and book chapters on medieval and early modern philosophy. He was a recipient of the Spinoza Award in 2016.