Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist

Courts that Matter
Activists, Judges, and the Politics of Rights Enforcement

$125.00 (F)

Part of Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy

  • Date Published: November 2023
  • availability: Available
  • format: Hardback
  • isbn: 9781009281997

$ 125.00 (F)
Hardback

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
eBook


Looking for an examination copy?

This title is not currently available for examination. However, if you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact [email protected] providing details of the course you are teaching.

Description
Product filter button
Description
Contents
Resources
Courses
About the Authors
  • In Courts that Matter, Sandra Botero tackles a crucial question: Can courts advance socioeconomic rights? Using a rigorous comparative study of the impact of socioeconomic rights rulings in Colombia and Argentina, Botero argues that such decisions can be significantly impactful when courts deploy certain monitoring mechanisms and when legally empowered organizations in civil society are engaged in the outcome. The book includes case studies of landmark rulings on environmental, health, housing, and other socioeconomic rights and charts pathways for broader applicability through comparison with rulings by the Indian Supreme Court. The book demonstrates how Colombian and Argentine highest tribunals have, at times, successfully configured important new political spaces for the effective pursuit of public policy goals, in conjunction and dialogue with other social and political actors. This title is part of the Flip it Open Programme and may also be available Open Access. Check our website Cambridge Core for details.

    • Uses a cross-regional perspective to compare Colombian and Argentine high courts
    • Showcases interdisciplinary research at the crossroads of political science and law
    • Speaks to classic debates in sociolegal studies about the consequences and impact of active rights enforcement and expansion
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    ‘Courts that Matter is the best book on judicial impact I’ve read in some time. Botero’s key empirical contribution is to highlight the use of monitoring mechanisms and collaborative oversight arenas by courts seeking to avoid some longstanding pitfalls facing effective implementation of their decisions. The book’s theoretical contribution is even more ambitious. Botero shows that at their best, judicial institutions sometimes collaborate with other key actors in the state and civil society to foster increased attention to, and deliberation about, entrenched practices of rights violation. Rather than displacing democratic politics from the outside, court decisions sometimes create new political spaces in which democratic politics can proceed.’ Thomas Moylan Keck, Michael O. Sawyer Chair of Constitutional Law and Politics, Syracuse University Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs

    ‘Courts That Matter is a must read for anyone interested in the big ‘so what?’ question of judicial politics: Do landmark court judgments make a difference in practice? – and, if so, when? and how? Through rigorous analysis of iconic judgments, Botero brings out their multidimensional influence on larger processes of change, and convincingly argues that monitoring mechanisms and legally empowered civil society organizations are significant in coproducing impact.’ Siri Gloppen, Professor of Comparative Politics and Founding Director, Centre on Law & Social Transformation, University of Bergen

    ‘This insightful study offers a careful and detailed comparative analysis of when and how courts can make a difference in complex socioeconomic rights cases. This is a must read for anyone interested in how rights can have an impact on the ground.' David Landau, Mason Ladd Professor and Associate Dean for International Programs, Florida State University College of Law

    ‘In Courts that Matter, Sandra Botero squarely faces the challenging question of when and how these non-elected, non-representative political actors become effective agents of social change. Botero convincingly shows that whereas courts have ‘neither purse nor sword’ they do have much more than ‘merely judgement’. After rendering decisions in socioeconomic rights, courts can deploy a series of oversight mechanisms that help coordinate advocacy organizations and political actors to turn them into real social transformation. A series of well-crafted and engaging analyses of courts’ decisions in Argentina, Colombia, and India provide compelling evidence of the argument and shed light on its nuances. Courts that Matter is a great resource for social scientists, legal scholars, activists, and judges alike.’ Julio Ríos-Figueroa, Professor of Political Science and Law, ITAM, Mexico City

    ‘Courts have become central actors in some democracies of the Global South. This book specifies the social and institutional mechanisms that have made this phenomenon possible. Sandra Botero makes a fundamental contribution to understanding the long-standing debate on the ability of judges to bring about significant social and political change through their decisions.’ Mauricio García Villegas, Professor of Politics and International Relations, National University of Colombia

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?

    ×

    Product details

    • Date Published: November 2023
    • format: Hardback
    • isbn: 9781009281997
    • length: 290 pages
    • dimensions: 235 x 158 x 18 mm
    • weight: 0.47kg
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Co-producing judicial impact
    3. Collaborative oversight arenas
    4. Assessing the effects of monitoring mechanisms and legal constituencies
    5. Low impact cases
    6. Collaborative Monitoring in India
    7. Conclusions
    8. Appendices.

  • Author

    Sandra Botero, Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
    Sandra Botero is Associate Professor at Universidad del Rosario (Bogotá, Colombia). She is the co-editor of The Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin America (2022).

Related Books

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email [email protected]

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×
warning icon

Turn stock notifications on?

You must be signed in to your Cambridge account to turn product stock notifications on or off.

Sign in Create a Cambridge account arrow icon
×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.

Cancel

Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

×
Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.
×