Practical Reasoning about Final Ends
$56.99 (P)
Part of Cambridge Studies in Philosophy
- Author: Henry S. Richardson, Georgetown University, Washington DC
- Date Published: February 1997
- availability: Available
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521574426
$
56.99
(P)
Paperback
Other available formats:
Hardback
Looking for an examination copy?
This title is not available for examination.
-
How should we reason about what we do? The answer offered by most recent philosophy, as well as such disciplines as decision theory, welfare economics, and political science, is that we should select efficient means to our ends. However, if we ask how we should decide which ends or goals to aim at, these standard theoretical approaches are silent. Henry Richardson argues that we can determine our ends rationally. He constructs a rich and original theory of how we can reason about what to seek for its own sake as a final goal. Richardson defuses the counterarguments for the limits of rational deliberation, and develops interesting ideas about how his model might be extended to interpersonal deliberation of ends, taking him to the borders of political theory.
Read more- Major new interpretation of the theory of rationality
- Strong endorsements from two pre-eminent philosophers, Martha Nussbaum and Michael Bratman
- Should interest social scientists in economics, law, and political science as well as philosophers
Reviews & endorsements
'This profound and important book challenges a common assumption about rationality: that all rational deliberation involves the selection of instrumental means to ends that are set by some non-rational process, for example by desires that are themselves impervious to reasoning. Drawing resourcefully on arguments of Aristotle and Plato, Richardson constructs an impressive account of the rationality involved in our selection and modification of our ultimate ends, and particularly of the ways in which a vague end can be more and more adequately specified by reflection. In the process, he offers the best account I have seen of the arguments for and against the claim that all values can be measured by a single common metric.' Martha Nussbaum, University of Chicago Law School
Customer reviews
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity
×Product details
- Date Published: February 1997
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521574426
- length: 344 pages
- dimensions: 215 x 138 x 23 mm
- weight: 0.442kg
- availability: Available
Table of Contents
Part I. Problem:
1. Introduction
2. Practical reasoning
Part II. Scope:
3. Ends in deliberation
4. Specifying ends
Part III. System:
5. Value incommensurability
6. Is commensurability a prerequisite of rational choice?
7. Practical coherence
8. Reflective sovereignty
Part IV. Source:
9. Sources and limits
10. Ultimate ends
Part V. Disagreement:
11. Interpersonal deliberation
12. Disagreement in concept and in practice
13. Dialectical softening
14. Realizing rationality.
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email [email protected]
Register Sign in» Proceed
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.
Continue ×Are you sure you want to delete your account?
This cannot be undone.
Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.
If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.
×