Crime and Culpability
A Theory of Criminal Law
Part of Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law
- Authors:
- Larry Alexander, University of San Diego School of Law
- Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Rutgers University, School of Law, Camden
- Date Published: May 2009
- availability: Available
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521739610
Paperback
Other available formats:
Hardback, eBook
Looking for an inspection copy?
This title is not currently available on inspection
-
This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organised around the principle that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan argue that desert is a function of the actor's culpability, and that culpability is a function of the risks of harm to protected interests that the actor believes he is imposing and his reasons for acting in the face of those risks. The authors deny that resultant harms, as well as unperceived risks, affect the actor's desert. They thus reject punishment for inadvertent negligence as well as for intentions or preparatory acts that are not risky. Alexander and Ferzan discuss the reasons for imposing risks that negate or mitigate culpability, the individuation of crimes, and omissions.
Read more- Takes a new and controversial angle on the crime and punishment debate
- Will appeal to criminologists, criminal lawyers and legal theorists as well as philosophers
- Shows not only theory, but how it would be put into practice
Customer reviews
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity
×Product details
- Date Published: May 2009
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521739610
- length: 374 pages
- dimensions: 229 x 152 x 21 mm
- weight: 0.55kg
- availability: Available
Table of Contents
Part I. Introduction: Retribution and the Criminal Law:
1. Criminal law, punishment, and desert
Part II. The Culpable Act:
2. The essence of culpability: acts manifesting insufficient concern for the legally protected interests of others
3. Negligence
4. Defeaters of culpability
Part III. The Immateriality of Resulting Harm to Legally Protected Interests:
5. Only culpability, not resulting harm, affects desert
6. When are inchoate crimes culpable and why?
7. The locus of culpability
Part IV. A Proposed Code:
8. What a culpability-based criminal code might look like.Instructors have used or reviewed this title for the following courses
- Advanced Philosophy of Law
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email [email protected]
Register Sign in» Proceed
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.
Continue ×Are you sure you want to delete your account?
This cannot be undone.
Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.
If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.
×