Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist

American Transitional Justice
Writing Cold War History in Human Rights Litigation

$29.99 USD

Part of Human Rights in History

  • Date Published: June 2020
  • availability: This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.
  • format: Adobe eBook Reader
  • isbn: 9781108804790

$ 29.99 USD
Adobe eBook Reader

You will be taken to ebooks.com for this purchase
Buy eBook Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Hardback, Paperback


Looking for an inspection copy?

This title is not currently available on inspection

Description
Product filter button
Description
Contents
Resources
Courses
About the Authors
  • Natalie Davidson offers an alternative account of Alien Tort Statute litigation by revisiting the field's two seminal cases, Filártiga (filed 1979) and Marcos (filed 1986), lawsuits ostensibly concerned with torture in Paraguay and the Philippines, respectively. Combining legal analysis, archival research and ethnographic methods, this book reveals how these cases operated as transitional justice mechanisms, performing the transition of the United States and its allies out of the Cold War order. It shows that US courts produced a whitewashed history of US involvement in repression in the Western bloc, while in Paraguay and the Philippines the distance from US courts allowed for a more critical narration of the lawsuits and their underlying violence as symptomatic of structural injustice. By exposing the political meanings of these legal landmarks for three societies, Davidson sheds light on the blend of hegemonic and emancipatory implications of international human rights litigation in US courts.

    • Offers a new interpretation of the Alien Tort Statute and two of its foundational cases, Filártiga and Marcos
    • Demonstrates how stories told in court in one country can be reinterpreted and transformed in other countries, and how the press shapes our understanding of human rights litigation
    • Examines human rights lawsuits using the methodologies of law, history, anthropology and communication studies to show how interdisciplinary analysis can contribute to understanding the history of human rights and planning human rights activism
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    'In this excellent and timely book, Davidson pushes the study of transitional justice away from its familiar focus on criminal proceedings and truth commissions towards a richer reckoning with the full range of legal mechanisms through which a politics of emancipation can be pursued. No less distinctively and originally, Davidson brings into sharp relief how legal actors pursuing rather local goals can nevertheless powerfully advance the larger interests of justice.' Lawrence Douglas, Amherst College, Massachusetts

    'Davidson's extensive on-the-ground research sheds new light on the achievements, limitations and perverse ways in which human rights litigation in the U.S. plays out. She brings a critical perspective that is nuanced and sophisticated, drawing from current work in human rights, anthropology, discourse studies as well as law.' Naomi Roht-Arriaza, University of California, Hastings Law

    'To what extent has America been held accountable for its conduct abroad during the Cold War? Read this book for an insightful interdisciplinary inquiry into the pursuit of justice through human rights litigation.' Ruti Teitel, Ernst C. Stiefel Professor of Comparative Law, New York Law School

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?

    ×

    Product details

    • Date Published: June 2020
    • format: Adobe eBook Reader
    • isbn: 9781108804790
    • availability: This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.
  • Table of Contents

    1. Introduction. Revisiting the Gilded Age of transnational human rights litigation in US courts
    2. Alien tort statute litigation in legal practice and the legal imagination
    3. 'Foreign torture, American justice': Filártiga in the United States
    4. Filártiga in Paraguay
    5. Narrating the Marcos regime in US courts
    6. The Marcos case and transitional justice in the Philippines
    7. Conclusion.

  • Author

    Natalie R. Davidson, Tel-Aviv University
    Natalie Davidson is a Lecturer in the Faculty of Law at Tel-Aviv University. She has published about Alien Tort Statute litigation, feminist interventions in international law, the prohibition of torture, and interdisciplinary methodology.

Related Books

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email [email protected]

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×
warning icon

Turn stock notifications on?

You must be signed in to your Cambridge account to turn product stock notifications on or off.

Sign in Create a Cambridge account arrow icon
×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.

Cancel

Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

×
Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.
×